Relevant Or Redundant? – BOSS

I came back from London late last night, and after strolling the streets for a few days, (mostly waiting while my wife and daughters shopped like there is no tomorrow), I did what I suppose most brand-builders do...analyse brands and concepts.

What follows is a new content series I call Relevant Or Redundant?

Each brand reviewed will get a Relevance Verdict, similar to our Relevance Score.

So, we'll see how this goes...I am sure I'll trigger some people...hopefully not too much. But true to my nature, I'll be straight and share my honest view as a brand strategist, informed by all the signals, trends, and insights provided by our Brand Intelligence System at Original Minds®.

Here is the first verdict, and I'll start with a brand we all know: BOSS

BOSS - Relevant or Redundant?

BOSS sits in a dangerous middle lane of global fashion — premium pricing without luxury status, mass distribution without mass love. Once a symbol of sleek German precision, it now competes in a hyper-fragmented market where identity, culture, and meaning drive choice.

Its category stakes are high: men’s fashion is undergoing a generational shift toward personal style, cultural codes, and values-led brands. BOSS remains a household name — but names alone don’t buy relevance anymore.

Signals

1. Identity-first fashion: Consumers (especially Gen Z–Millennials) buy brands that mirror who they are or who they want to become — not just what fits.
2. Cultural diffusion: Streetwear, luxury, nostalgia, and creator-led brands are rewriting the style codes BOSS once owned.
3. The Brand Barbell: The market squeezes the middle — cheap or luxury wins. Mid-tier fashion brands must deliver meaning or die.

How They’re Showing Up

BOSS is leaning heavily into celebrity marketing and high-polish campaigns. Visually clean, expensive-looking, often athletic-infused. But the brand lives mostly in traditional advertising spaces, not cultural ones. The work signals aspiration but not identity. It feels controlled, safe, and slightly generic — a premium fashion brand trying to play modern but still anchored in a 2010s aesthetic of “sharp suits, perfect people, controlled confidence.”

Verdict: Relevant or Redundant?

Relevant — but sliding toward Redundant.

BOSS still has equity, reach, and recognition. But it’s operating at a cultural delay. The brand is visible, but not vital. Present, but not participating. It’s in the danger zone where middle-tier brands lose cultural permission quickly if they don’t evolve.

The Relevance Gap™

The gap sits between cultural codes and brand expression. Culture has shifted to personality, story, craft, subculture, and lived authenticity — but BOSS still communicates perfection, control, and sanitized aspiration. Consumers want identity-driven brands; BOSS delivers image-driven branding. The result: it lacks emotional resonance with younger audiences, lacks cultural authority, and lacks distinct meaning in a world where “looking good” is no longer enough.

How to Close the Gap

1. Inject cultural specificity — tap subcultures, creators, and lived narrative—not celebrities and gloss.
2. Move from ‘perfect aesthetic’ to ‘personal identity’ — help people see themselves, not an unattainable ideal.
3. Develop distinctive codes — modern German precision reinvented for today: functional beauty, quiet confidence, utility-meets-style.
4. Redesign the brand’s emotional role — from “look sharp” to “show who you are.”
5. Shift from campaigns to cultural participation — creators, micro-scenes, product storytelling, craftsmanship, transparency.

The Bottom Line

BOSS can still lead — but only if it stops acting like a premium legacy brand trying to stay relevant, and starts behaving like a cultural contributor with a point of view. Modern leaders know: relevance is not inherited; it’s earned in real time.

Feel free to share your thoughts.

--

Want to know how relevant (or redundant) your brand is?
DM or reply “Score” and we’ll run your Brand Relevance Score™.